Trust is both an enabler and a result of a collaborative environment, so it was not surprising to see trust cited as an important ingredient in the IPC success stories. In a team environment one needs to know the different roles of the various team members and trust that the respective tasks are being done. One participant called it the ingredient that was either going to "make it or break it". A symptom of a non-trusting environment was noted by one participant when they recalled a time where one physiotherapist would complete a discharge assessment on one day and on the next morning another physiotherapist would feel compelled to do it again. It was interesting to also note that ownership was linked to trust in two very different ways. Ownership was seen as an impediment to IPC in the following example:
This can be contrasted to the positive connotations of ownership as noted below:
It would appear that ownership can play a dual role. The difference is that in a team environment there is a collective pride and sense of ownership towards shared goals (for example holistic care of the client), while in a non-trusting environment individual care givers tend to take personal and exclusive ownership over the specific elements of care for which they are responsible.
Other trust related comments were that in patient centred collaborative care, there has to not only be trust between the various care providers, but also between the care providers and the patient (who actually are part of the care team). This trusting relationship may need some nurturing with team care as a nurse from a family health team commented that: